Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• parser bug - or my?
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: parser bug - or my?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: parser bug - or my?
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• future tense
  • From: "Peter L. Schuerman" <plschuerman@UCDAVIS.EDU>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: future tense
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• tense
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: "Cyril Slobin" <slobin@feast.fe.msk.ru>
• h for apostrophe
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• future tense
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: future tense
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: tense conversions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: h for apostrophe
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• tenses
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: tenses
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tenses
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: tenses
  • From: Anonymous
• Some questions on le'avla
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: Some questions on le'avla
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Some questions on le'avla
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Some questions on le'avla
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Some questions on le'avla
  • From: BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.Tr.Unisys.com
• la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• la mark,l fraba'u fi la mark
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• lo lerfu me'e zo y'y a zo y'y.bu
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Attemptive?
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• Re: tenses
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• questions
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• On and around "let"
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: CONLANG: Babel Text in Basic Anglo-Saxon English
  • From: Jeffrey Henning <74774.157@COMPUSERVE.COM>
• Re: tenses
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: questions
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lo lerfu me'e zo y'y a zo y'y.bu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: questions
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: tenses
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: questions
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Poetic?
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• Re: lo lerfu me'e zo y'y a zo y'y.bu
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: tenses
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Poetry
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Hello there everyone, I just got this address and have just began to
  • From: EDWARDMD@UDMERCY.EDU
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: lo lerfu me'e zo y'y a zo y'y.bu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tenses
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: tenses
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tenses
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: tenses
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: tenses
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tenses
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tenses
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• katna
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• imperatives
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• loj
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Third person imperative
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• "ko" considered bad
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• capu'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• imperatives
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• perfective counting
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• subscripts on numbers and lerfu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• perfect facades
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• purple lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: perfective counting
  • From: Mark A Biggar <mab@WDL.LORAL.COM>
• Re: imperatives
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: perfective counting
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• perfective counting
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfect facades
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• katna
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• rafsi of cmavo
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfective counting
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: katna
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: tenses
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Chinese whispers questions
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: imperatives
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: imperatives
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: rafsi of cmavo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: imperatives
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Chinese whispers questions
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Imperatives
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• goi (was: "ko" considered bad)
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: Imperatives
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: goi (was: "ko" considered bad)
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• your availablility next few months?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: Imperatives
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• lojbo rimni
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: lo lerfu me'e zo y'y a zo y'y.bu
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: questions
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: questions
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: la mark,l fraba'u fi la xorxes
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: On and around "let"
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: tenses
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: purple lojban
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: perfective counting
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: rafsi of cmavo
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: Anonymous
• PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 36: Simplify vocative expressions
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: purple lojban
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• New versions of reference grammar papers available!
  • From: Anonymous
• Relative clause paper, part 1 of 2
  • From: Anonymous
• Relative clause paper, part 2 of 2
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Qs: VhVhV & PAPAMEI &c.
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Relative clause paper, part 2 of 2
  • From: jorge@phyast.pitt.edu
• NAI
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: goi (was: "ko" considered bad)
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• cmalu srera
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: NAI
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: NAI
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• lujvo-making
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lujvo-making
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• cmalu srera
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: purple lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• lojban, lip reading and cmavo
  • From: "Peter L. Schuerman" <plschuerman@UCDAVIS.EDU>
• Re: cmalu srera
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: lujvo-making
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: purple lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lojban, lip reading and cmavo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Incredible!
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Lojban FTP site has moved to powered.cs.yale.edu
  • From: Erik Rauch <rauch-erik@CS.YALE.EDU>
• Re: purple lojban
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: NAI
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: NAI
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• rel clause paper
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: "ko" considered bad
  • From: Anonymous
• drata cmasre
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: NAI
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: Anonymous
• diphthongs in names
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: NAI
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Nick, absenting himself
  • From: Nick Nicholas <nnich@LEON.NRCPS.ARIADNE-T.GR>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: diphthongs in names
  • From: Anonymous
• CONLANG: Yet unuther simplufyd speling sistum.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• NAI
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• quantified variables - beginers question
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: quantified variables - beginers question
  • From: Anonymous
• conflicts in grammar.235
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: conflicts in grammar.235
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: quantified variables - beginers question
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: conflicts in grammar.235
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: conflicts in grammar.235
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: quantified variables - beginers question
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: quantified variables - beginers question
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: conflicts in grammar.235
  • From: Paulo Barreto <BARRETO%VELAHF@ECCSA.TR.UNISYS.COM>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• M.Helsem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: NAI
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: CONLANG: Yet unuther simplufyd speling sistum.
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: M.Helsem
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: M.Helsem
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Grammar.235
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• grammar.235
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: rel clause paper
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Grammar.235
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: Anonymous
• PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 36 (rev 2): Clarify vocative phrases
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: pe'u ko fanva le do da'amri
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• ckafybarja
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: ckafybarja
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: Incredible!
  • From: cbogart@quetzal.com (Chris Bogart)
• -gua!spi (was: Incredible!)
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: PROPOSED GRAMMAR CHANGE 36 (rev 2): Clarify vocative phrases
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• the last few weeks
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• LogFlash
  • From: "Roberto Ricci - CASPUR c/o Univ. Roma1 - tel. 39-6-49913573" <RRICCI@caspur.it>
• Lojban
  • From: D Gary Grady <73513.2350@compuserve.com>
• Re: ckafybarja
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: drata ke ckafybarja lisri
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: rotation
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Pointing
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: ckafybarja
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Almost & barely
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• fuzzy touching
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>