[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grammar.235
la lojbab. cusku di'e
> John Cowan appears not to have answered yet on this, so let me pipe in.
>
> The standard for Lojban grammars is to tolerate NO shift/reduce errors.
>
> As far as I know, our testing of grammar.235 produced no s/r errors
> (and it appears from files John left around today that he tried again
> and got the same result).
And apparently my report never left this machine, for reasons unknown.
I tested grammar.235 against several different yaccs: SunOS yacc (basically
AT&T), SCO Unix yacc (AT&T), Berkeley yacc (AT&T-free), GNU Bison 1.24,
and Abraxas PCYACC (a commercial MS-DOS clone). All created conflict-free
parsers with no problems.
> This implies that someone's version of YACC is buggy.
Right. I'm not sure what the ancestry of the yacc used by {la paulos.} is,
but it may have trouble handling such a large and complicated input, with
its 1077 lookahead sets.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
- References:
- Grammar.235
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>