[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Still a few thoughts about ZAhOs

To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Subject: Re: Still a few thoughts about ZAhOs
From: John Cowan <snark!cowan@GVLS1.VFL.PARAMAX.COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 11:21:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <9308161823.AA22907@relay1.UU.NET> from "Jorge LLambias" at Aug 16, 93 02:21:23 pm
Reply-To: John Cowan <snark!cowan@GVLS1.VFL.PARAMAX.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>

la xorxes. cusku di'e

> Presumably, Paul's coming to damascus has long ago _left_ its ba'o stage too,
> or is all this "immediate relevance to the present" that we've been assuming
> unwarranted?

I don't know whether it's warranted or not (Bob Chassell would argue not).
But in any event, that particular {nunklama} is certainly relevant to the
present: the current war in Bosnia would hardly exist without it!

--
John Cowan      cowan@snark.thyrsus.com         ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

Prev by Date: Re: TEXT: Re: TEXT: Imagist
Next by Date: Re: Rob's signoff
Prev by thread: Re: Still a few thoughts about ZAhOs
Next by thread: Re: Still a few thoughts about ZAhOs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread