[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gismu comments: OPEN ISSUE- lebna et.al.

To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Subject: Re: gismu comments: OPEN ISSUE- lebna et.al.
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1993 10:20:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <199312080939.AA20084@access.digex.net> from "Logical Language Group" at Dec 8, 93 04:39:44 am
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> The following is the only unresolved issue on my list regarding the
> draft dictionary rebaseline of the gismu list.  Please comment.

In brief, I continue to believe that copying/taking/removing/borrowing
should apply to objects only; doing the analogous thing to properties
is the appropriate domain of a lujvo involving (se) ckafi.
--
John Cowan              sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
                e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

Prev by Date: LaTeX- and Postscript-versions of the new gismu list
Next by Date: TeX-file corrections at casper.cs.yale.edu
Prev by thread: gismu comments: OPEN ISSUE- lebna et.al.
Next by thread: NEW GISMU LIST (and Logflash files) posted to FTP site
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread