Re: kau obverse

[jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU]

la djer cusku di'e

> I might add that if xa'a were accepted, we could say:
> .i mi djuno xa'a dakau klama le zarci.

That would be ungrammatical, you have two selbri in the sentence.
Probably you want {poi klama le zarci}, but you wouldn't need the {kau}.

> xa'a would allow x2 djuno to accept an object/person. x3 and x4 djuno
> are left intact giving djuno a different definition than sanji. xa'a
> would really add a lot of expressive power to the language as well as
> allowing very natural (for E-speakers at least) expressions, such as
> "Alas, poor Yorik, I knew *him* well".

uu la iorik  i mi ri selsau

co'o mi'e xorxes