[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: My use of lekau
la lojbab cusku di'e
> Marking the "le" is roughly equivalent to making the whole sumti, with
> focus on the specificity that "le" indicates. Since I am focussing on
> an identity issue, this might expand as follows:
>
> mi na djuno tu'a lekau se cmene be <<lo'u juhi lobypilno le'u>>
> mi na djuno tu'a [le se cmene be <<lo'u juhi lobypilno le'u>> ku]kau
> mi na djuno tu'a [[cy]kau
No argument up to here, but then:
> mi na djuno ledu'u [[cy]kau du ma[kau]
is uncomprehensible to me. Eliding the last {kau} changes the meaning
completely.
mi na djuno le du'u cykau du ma
I don't know what is what?
mi na djuno le du'u cykau du makau
I don't know what is what.
The first one is a question, the second one isn't.
Jorge