Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• "any" and misc, Logical Language Group
• more on "any", Logical Language Group
• your posting and Holmes' reply, Logical Language Group
  • Re: your posting and Holmes' reply, veion
• Lojban, Logical Language Group
• Re: context in Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, Chris Bogart
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
    • Re: context in Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, Chris Bogart
• Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, jorge
    • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, Logical Language Group
• Cowan weighs in #2: needing a box, Logical Language Group
• Cowan weighs in #3: John and James love Steve or Mary, Logical Language Group
• Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives, jorge
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives, Chris Bogart
• Cowan weighs in #5: tenses, Logical Language Group
• logic for language, DonSimpson
• Re: lo, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • lo, John E. Clifford
  • Re: lo, jorge
  • Re: lo, ucleaar
  • lo, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: lo, i.alexander.bra0125
• logic for language (fwd), Logical Language Group
• Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
    • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising, ucleaar
• Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi", Jorge Llambias
    • Cowan withdraws magic "lo" proposal (was: Cowan's summary #2), Logical Language Group
• Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all, Gerald Koenig
• wff, lo broda...le broda, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Logical Language Group
  • Re: wff, lo broda...le broda, Jorge Llambias
• Outside quantifiers on masses, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Outside quantifiers on masses, Jorge Llambias
• "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, i.alexander.bra0125
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Logical Language Group
  • Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus, Jorge Llambias
• "ro" doesn't imply +specific, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific, ucleaar
• "le re loi tanxe", Logical Language Group
• Ralph believes someone is a spy, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy, bob
• PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Chris Bogart
    • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Nick Legend Nicholas
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Veijo Vilva
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban, Jorge Llambias
• anyone want a Lojban logo .bmp?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: anyone want a Lojban logo .bmp?, C_Burke%semperfi
  • Re: anyone want a Lojban logo .bmp?, John E. Clifford
• Re: PROPOSAL Lambda..., Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: PROPOSAL Lambda..., Gerald Koenig
    • Re: PROPOSAL Lambda..., Logical Language Group
• how to use Lojban list, bob
• RE: our last mail to me, rricci
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Logical Language Group
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Logical Language Group
  • solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
    • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Logical Language Group
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, ucleaar
  • Re: solutions to sumti opacity, Jorge Llambias
• Re: some outstanding issues, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • some outstanding issues, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: some outstanding issues, Nick Legend Nicholas
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Logical Language Group
  • lohe, lehe & ka, ucleaar
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, ucleaar
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, ucleaar
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, ucleaar
    • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Logical Language Group
      • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, ucleaar
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lohe, lehe & ka, Jorge Llambias
• Re: more on lehe & ka, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • more on lehe & ka, ucleaar
• alias list update please, Logical Language Group
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, jorge
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, jorge
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
• Re: singular and plural, jorge
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: singular and plural, jorge
• Re: some definitions, i.alexander.bra0125
• Re: veridicality, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: veridicality, ucleaar
  • Re: veridicality, jorge
• lo, transparency, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lo, transparency, jorge
• veridicality trivial?, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: veridicality trivial?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: veridicality trivial?, jorge
  • Re: veridicality trivial?, ucleaar
    • Truth/satisfaction conditions, Logical Language Group
  • Re: veridicality trivial?, DLS9
  • Re: veridicality trivial?, Nick Legend Nicholas
• Lojban equivalent of "which?"., Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Lojban equivalent of "which?"., jorge
• -veridical, -specific, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: -veridical, -specific, jorge
• any, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: any, ucleaar
  • Re: any, jorge
  • Re: any, i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: any, Jorge Llambias
• {lo} excellent as is, bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: {lo} excellent as is, ucleaar
• lo & quantifiers, Gerald Koenig
• le ninmu veridicality query, bob
• Subject: Re: any, Goran Topic
• negation translation, bob
  • Re: negation translation, Logical Language Group
• Re: two typical men, bob
• Re: re loi smani, bob
  • Re: re loi smani, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: re loi smani, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: re loi smani, Goran Topic
• Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
• lo, da poi, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lo, da poi, Jorge Llambias
• size of breeds, bob
• small universe consequences, bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
  • Re: small universe consequences, bob
  • Re: small universe consequences, ucleaar
    • Re: small universe consequences, Logical Language Group
• quick comment on {loi}, bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: quick comment on {loi}, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: quick comment on {loi}, bob
• terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Goran Topic
  • Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Goran Topic
  • Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Goran Topic
• opacity and ol' uncle tom cobleigh, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: opacity and ol' uncle tom cobleigh, Jorge Llambias
• Re: da'i, bob
• Re: Cowan's sum:opaque, Gerald Koenig
• Subject: Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
• Subject: Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Subject: Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu, Jorge Llambias
• Re: Cowan's sum#3 any.., Jorge Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Cowan's sum#3 any.., ucleaar
• existential quantification, ucleaar
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: existential quantification, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: existential quantification, ucleaar
  • Re: existential quantification, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: existential quantification, ucleaar
• diversity, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: diversity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: diversity, ucleaar
  • Re: diversity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: diversity, ucleaar
  • Re: diversity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: diversity, ucleaar
  • Re: diversity, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: diversity, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: diversity, Jorge Llambias
• Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, Jorge Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, ucleaar
    • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, bob
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, ucleaar
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, ucleaar
  • Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri, Jorge Llambias
• TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto, Jorge Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto, Goran Topic
  • Re: TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto, Jorge Llambias
• Re: TECH: existential quantification, Iain Alexander
• Ol Uncle Tom Cobleigh, John E. Clifford
• lo + opaque, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lo + opaque, ucleaar
  • Re: lo + opaque, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lo + opaque, ucleaar
  • Re: lo + opaque, Jorge Llambias
• Re: Water beds, Iain Alexander
• veridicality in grammar, bob
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, David Bowen
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, bob
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, bob
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, bob
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, ucleaar
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, Chris Handley
  • Re: veridicality in grammar, bob
• Someone swimming (simple exercise), bob
• Help!, Roberto Ricci
• Re: more sources of opacity-like phenomena, Jorge Llambias
• TEXT: pemci, ucleaar
• cmavo hit-list, Jorge Llambias