[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 1994 13:16:50 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group)
- In-Reply-To: <199411160649.AA10466@nfs2.digex.net> from "Chris Bogart" at Nov 15, 94 10:56:10 pm
mi pu cusku di'e
> >This proposal involves creating an explicit "lambda quantifier", which would
> >formally belong to selma'o PA but would be attached only to da-series KOhA
> >or BY cmavo. Call it "xa'e" temporarily. Using it, Example 11
> >can be translated:
> >
> >15) le ka xa'eda mamta [zo'e]
la kris. cusku di'e
> Could this also replace "ke'a" in POI phrases? It seems so similar to ke'a
> that there ought to be some way to combine them or at least make them
> somehow parallel...
>
> *mi nelci da poi xa'eda mamta
> "I like things which are mothers"
You don't need "ke'a" in that situation, because "da" suffices:
mi nelci da poi da mamta
"ke'a" is most useful when the sumti being modified by the relative clause
has no natural anaphora.
> The differences between ke'a, -kau, and xa'e are interesting to think about;
> they seem to do similar things in different contexts. I have to say they
> almost seem like kluges, but I can't think of any way around using them.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Agreed.
--
John Cowan sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.