Mail Index

• Thread Index

• "any" and misc
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• more on "any"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• your posting and Holmes' reply
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: your posting and Holmes' reply
  • From: veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #2: needing a box
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #3: John and James love Steve or Mary
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #5: tenses
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• logic for language
  • From: DonSimpson@aol.com
• Re: lo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• logic for language (fwd)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Truth/satisfaction conditions
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• wff, lo broda...le broda
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Outside quantifiers on masses
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• "ro" doesn't imply +specific
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• "le re loi tanxe"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: re loi smani
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: negation translation
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Ralph believes someone is a spy
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: wff, lo broda...le broda
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan withdraws magic "lo" proposal (was: Cowan's summary #2)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• anyone want a Lojban logo .bmp?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: anyone want a Lojban logo .bmp?
  • From: C_Burke%semperfi@MWMGATE1.mitre.org
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: anyone want a Lojban logo .bmp?
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@crl.com>
• Re: PROPOSAL Lambda...
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: PROPOSAL Lambda...
  • From: jlk@netcom.com (Gerald Koenig)
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all
  • From: jlk@netcom.com (Gerald Koenig)
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• how to use Lojban list
  • From: bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
• RE: our last mail to me
  • From: rricci@vaxrma.cern.ch
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: some outstanding issues
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: more on lehe & ka
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• alias list update please
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: singular and plural
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@quetzal.com>
• Re: some definitions
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: singular and plural
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: veridicality
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• lo, transparency
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: veridicality
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• veridicality trivial?
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Lojban equivalent of "which?".
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Lojban equivalent of "which?".
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: DLS9@aol.com
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: lo, transparency
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• -veridical, -specific
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: -veridical, -specific
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@quetzal.com>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@quetzal.com>
• any
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: Nick Legend Nicholas <nsn@SPEECH.LANGUAGE.UNIMELB.EDU.AU>
• lo
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• {lo} excellent as is
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: lo
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: any
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• lo & quantifiers
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: {lo} excellent as is
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: any
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: lo
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• lo
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: lo
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• le ninmu veridicality query
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: any
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Subject: Re: any
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• negation translation
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: two typical men
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: re loi smani
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi"
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Outside quantifiers on masses
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: wff, lo broda...le broda
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: any
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• lo, da poi
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: lo, da poi
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: re loi smani
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: re loi smani
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: wff, lo broda...le broda
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@quetzal.com>
• size of breeds
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• small universe consequences
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Nick Legend Nicholas <nsn@SPEECH.LANGUAGE.UNIMELB.EDU.AU>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• quick comment on {loi}
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: PROPOSAL Lambda...
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: quick comment on {loi}
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• opacity and ol' uncle tom cobleigh
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: quick comment on {loi}
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: da'i
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's sum:opaque
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: opacity and ol' uncle tom cobleigh
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Subject: Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Subject: Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: Subject: Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's sum#3 any..
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• existential quantification
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: PROPOSAL: Lambda Notation For Dummies (and & Rosta) & Lojban
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: existential quantification
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• diversity
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: diversity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: small universe consequences
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: existential quantification
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: existential quantification
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: existential quantification
  • From: Iain Alexander <ia@STRYX.DEMON.CO.UK>
• Re: diversity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• some outstanding issues
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Cowan's sum#3 any..
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: existential quantification
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Ol Uncle Tom Cobleigh
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: diversity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: diversity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• lo + opaque
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: lo + opaque
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• more on lehe & ka
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TEXT: vomoi pemcrsoneto
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: diversity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lo + opaque
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: diversity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: lo + opaque
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: diversity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lo + opaque
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Water beds
  • From: Iain Alexander <ia@STRYX.DEMON.CO.UK>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• veridicality in grammar
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Someone swimming (simple exercise)
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: David Bowen <dmb@ironwood.cray.com>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: diversity
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: terbasna bo preti ce nuncpedu
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: some outstanding issues
  • From: Nick Legend Nicholas <nsn@SPEECH.LANGUAGE.UNIMELB.EDU.AU>
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Help!
  • From: Roberto Ricci <RRICCI@sci.uniroma1.it>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: solutions to sumti opacity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: Chris Handley <chandley@OTAGO.AC.NZ>
• Re: more sources of opacity-like phenomena
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: diversity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• TEXT: pemci
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• cmavo hit-list
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lohe, lehe & ka
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: veridicality in grammar
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU