[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject: Re: TEXT: pemci
lojbab:
> >What I think is malglico (but not carmi malglico) is not the decision
> >not to make number distinctions obligatory, but rather the failure to
> >design in a short & simple way to indicate plurality.
>
> But why plurality in paritcular. Why not singular/dual/su'oci?
> Or why not the Russian system which is singular/2-5/su'oxa but then after
> 20 cycles again on the last 1 or 2 digits so that 21 is singular?
> (Russian also does have a straight plural but it is not used when there
> is a specific number involved.)
Croatian has the same weird system... We have several kinds of
plurals, but do not distinguish between them, except morphologically:
there is a short plural, long plural, and plural used for 2-5, which
is, I believe, historically derived from dual.
sat = hour or clock = Nom. sg.
satovi Nom. long plural, = clocks
sati Nom. short plural, = hours
jedan sat Nom. sg. = 1 hour/clock
dva/tri/cetiri sata
short Gen. Pl. for 2-5, = 2/3/4 of hours/clocks
pet/sest/.../dvadeset sati/satova
short/long Gen. Pl. for >4 = 5/6/.../20 of hours/clocks
dvadeset/trideset/... i jedan sat
twenty/thirty/... and one hour/clock (Nom. SG!)
dvadeset/trideset/... i dva/tri/cetiri sata
twenty/thirty/... and two/three/four of hours/clocks (short Gen. Pl. <5)
dvadeset/trideset/... i pet/.../devet sati/satova
twenty/thirty/... and five/.../nine of hours/clocks (short/long Gen. Pl. >4)
etc.
BTW, And, no, I know three languages with dual (Old Irish, Sanskrt and
Slovenian), and pe'i every one of them uses dual WHENEVER there is two
instances of the nomen in question. E.g. (not sure if completely correct):
Slov. Engl.
jaz grem I go
midva greva We-two go
mi gremo We go
I hope this wasn't too off topic.
.i seljvajbo fa lu co'o mi'e. goran. li'u
--
Learn languages! The more langs you know, the more incomprehensible you can get
e'udoCILreleiBANgu.izo'ozo'onairoBANguteDJUnobedocubanRI'a.ailekadonaka'eSELjmi