[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LOJBAN: error report from STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ
- Subject: LOJBAN: error report from STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ
- From: BITNET list server at CUVMB (1.8a) <LISTSERV@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 21:28:12 -0400
The enclosed mail file, found in the LOJBAN reader and shown under the spoolid
7264 in the console log, has been identified as a possible delivery error
notice for the following reason: mail origin is listed in "Filter=" list header
keyword (or its default value for LOJBAN).
------------------------- Message in error (81 lines) -------------------------
3 Dec 1994 15:13:44 +1300
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 1994 15:13:44 +1300
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>
Message-Id: <199412030213.AA05117@arwen.otago.ac.nz>
Subject: Returned mail: unknown mailer error 255
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 <st004202@stonebow.otago.ac.nz>... unknown mailer error 255
----- Unsent message follows -----
4 +1300
3 Dec 1994 15:12:12 +1300
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 1994 20:30:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject: RE: more sources of opacity-like phenomena
Resent-To: st004202@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Resent-Message-Id: <01HK7M6BRIS2B8JRJ1@rivendell.otago.ac.nz>
Message-Id: <01HK7M59DLK2B7B777@rivendell.otago.ac.nz>
X-Envelope-To: st004202@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
X-Vms-To: IN%"chandley@otago.ac.nz" "Chris Handley"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
And:
> And what about the scope of tenses and quantified sumti?
> My example was "I regularly read a book" - is it the same book
> or a possibly different book on each occasion?
As I understand it:
mi di'i tcidu lo cukta
Regularly it is the case that there is a book that I read
(not necessarily the same one).
This is different from:
mi di'i tcidu le cukta
Regularly it is the case that I read the book(s) I'm talking about
(the same one(s)).
Also you can say:
mi tcidu lo cukta di'i[ku]
There is a book that I read regularly
(obviously the same one, nonspecific).
>This depends on
> whether the 'tense' [is it tahe? - I don't remember offhand]
> has scope over "lo cukta".
It does if attached to the selbri. (It can be thought as being universally
quantified over in-mind instances, just like {le}. That is why it commutes
with universally quantified things (le) but not with existentially
quantified ones (lo, and as far as I can tell, loi as well).
Jorge