[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: possible sumti-raising place structures of the sisku variety

To Logical Language Group respond I thus:

#festi waste x1(s) is/are waste product(s) [left to waste] by x2
#(object/event) a 20 (cf. xaksu)

This one looks to me like raising. I weakly favour removing it.

#kanji calculate 'reckon' x1 calculates/reckons/computes x2 [value/state]
#from data x3 by process x4 7e 0 (cf. kancu, jdice)

A value is not really an object, but an abstraction, even if not the same
kind of abstraction as a {ni} clause; so there isn't a real distinction here.

#pante protest x1 protests/objects to/complains about x2
#(object/event/state) to audience x3 with action x4 9c 12 (x4 is an event
#or tu'a quotation)

This too looks a bit like raising. I'd remove it. (You don't protest taxes,
but their imposition on you; you don't protest oppresors, but oppresion.)

#zvati at x1 (object/event) is at/attending/present at x2
#(event/location) 4d 184 [recation for an
#object/activity that is mobile]; (cf. especially stuzi for an
#inherent/inalienable location, jbini, nenri, se varji for physical
#shape, tapla, bliku, kubli, kurfa, cukla)

I can understand how an event can be a {se zvati}, but need it be a {zvati}
as well? I'd remove the event from x1. Or at least I'd like an example
where an event can be at another event, that doesn't sound forced.

 A freshman once observed to me:         Nick Nicholas am I, of Melbourne, Oz.
 On the edge of the Rubicon,             nsn@munagin.ee.mu.oz.au (IRC: nicxjo)
 men don't go fishing.                   CogSci and CompSci & wannabe Linguist.
   - Alice Goodman, _Nixon In China_     Mail me! Mail me! Mail me! Or don't!!