[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BAIbo grammar
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,       Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,       Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
 
- Subject: BAIbo grammar
 
- From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!C.J.Fine>
 
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1992 11:57:21 GMT
 
- Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!C.J.Fine>
 
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
 
I am confused about the use of tags (sumti tcita) in contexts other than
terms.
I recall the following exposition in one of the textbook lessons:
        ba le fasnu mi klama            After the event, I go
        baku mi klama                   After (something unspecified), I
                                        go - Afterwards, I go
        mi ba klama                     I after-the-current-reference-
                                        point go
Not in that exposition, but consistently:
        babo mi klama                   Then/next, I go
I therefore want to construct this paradigm:
        ki'u le fasnu mi klama          Because of the event, I go
        ki'uku mi klama                 Because (of something unspecified),
                                        I go - Therefore I go
        mi ki'u klama                   I because of the-currently-
                                        assumed-situation go - So I go
        ki'ubo mi klama                 So I go.
But I observe various people using "seri'abo" and "seni'ibo" to mean
"therefore", and not "because".
                        What's going on?
                        kolin
                                c.j.fine@bradford.ac.uk