Re: subordinate interrogatives

[Iain Alexander <ia@stryx.demon.co.uk>]

In message <848939453.101117.0@cunyvm.cuny.edu> a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK writes:
>
> "For every x, there is something that is a truth value and
> that she thinks is the truth-value of the proposition that
> x is cardinality of the set y such that every z is a member
> of y if and only if z is apple and I eat z"
>
> {....kuau da cardinality loi ge plise gi citka be fa mi}
>
> (where {loi} is my new way of spelling everyone else's {lo'i}/{lohi}).
>
> I don't have any reference materials at hand to find suitable
> selbri valsi for "cardinality".

{te kancu}
is the best I can find.

Just to make it even more impenetrable, the way to deal with
the x1 of {kancu} appears to be

... ku'a'u di du da gi'anai te kancu lo'i gu'e plise gi citka be fa mi rode
--
Iain Alexander                    ia@stryx.demon.co.uk
                    I.Alexander@bra0125.wins.icl.co.uk