[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TECH: magnitude
- To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- Subject: Re: TECH: magnitude
- From: jimc@math.ucla.edu
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 09:59:11 -0800
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Mar 96 15:10:14 EST." <9603122229.AB25318@julia.math.ucla.edu>
> I have been kicking around the idea of a new cmavo of selma'o KI,
> "ki'i'i" temporarily. A sumti tcita involving this will be a specific
> magnitude, thus:
>
> 1) mi dansu le bisli ve'a ki'i'i lo mitre be li pa
> I dance on the ice over-interval one-meter.
> etc.
It looks like you want the equivalent of fi'o ... [fe'u] in an interval. I wonder
if fi'o by itself would work. I suggest that rather than ki'i'i <sumti with args>
you should use ki'i'i'i <subordinate bridi>. Rationale: Lojban is about predicates,
and you get more flexibility by using them. Semantically specify what is the
referent of ke'a -- presumably the interval rather than the whole sentence as
it normally would be. Do not restrict the stuffing to just numeric expressions;
there's no need.
-- jimc