[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TECH QUERY: variant fu'ivla
- To: cowan@locke.ccil.org
- Subject: Re: TECH QUERY: variant fu'ivla
- From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 96 19:21:25 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <199601161945.OAA09289@locke.ccil.org> (message from John Cowanon Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:45:23 -0500 (EST))
John Cowan said:
... in type 3 fu'ivla (those made with gismu-based
prefixes): either a four-letter rafsi or a CCV rafsi can be used as the
prefix (CVC and CVV rafsi aren't safe): "ricrxacere" and "tricrxacere"
are both possibilities for "maple" (genus >Acer<). So far, the Lojban
community hasn't taken a position on whether or not these are to be
taken as equivalent.
I favor declaring them equivalent: while this limits the theoretical
size of fu'ivla space, it makes for simplicity: you need not remember
whether "cipnrdodo" or "cpirdodo" is the official word for "dodo".
Comments?
I agree; these should be equivalent, just like lujvo.
Robert J. Chassell bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu
25 Rattlesnake Mountain Road bob@rattlesnake.com
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (413) 298-4725