sera'aku le'ala'ezo PLI zoigy. would gy. se fanva fu ma

[Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>]

cu'u la kl,n. zoigy.
> A way round is to use 'lakne':
>       .i na'e lakne pe'i fa le nu ra ba facki lemi'a pajygunta
gy.

.i mi na tugni

It's not just that they were other-than-probably going to discover the
ambuscade, but as it turned out they did >actually< discover it due to some
unspecified event.

cu'u la .eduard. zoigy.
> I believe that the implication is that
> 1) In the normal course of events, the ambuscade _would not_ be discovered
> before the attack, and _would_ attack as planned (all hypothetical).
> 2) Something else happened. The ambuscade was not discovered, but did not
> attack (actual).
gy.

.i mi na tugni do lesedu'u go'i .i le nunpajgunta pu ca'a te facki .i e'o do
cusku ra bau la lojban.

ni'o co'omi'e dn.