[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: afterthought conn within NU?
la .and. cusku di'e
> [Y]ou can't do afterthought
> bridi connectives within a NU clause. Is this true? I certainly don't
> know how to do it, but I'd always assumed that that was because I
> don't know how to do most things Lojban is capable of.
It's true. The afterthought bridi connectives are really afterthought
>sentence< connectives, being grammatical variants of ".i", so they can't
be used within embedded bridi.
> Nik says to
> Ivan that the solution is to insert a {kei} plus sumti conn
> (i.e., I presume, {le nu .... kei e le nu...}) but that quite
> obviously distorts the semantics (so much so that I conclude I
> misunderstood the discussion due to poor audio quality).
So it does, so it does. The real solution is to Plan Ahed.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.