Re: cmavo hit list - lojbab responds

[Logical Language Group <lojbab>]

>> are back-referencing from within the sumti itself.  "le tavla be la goran
>> bei ri" refers to some sumti previous toi the whole phrase since the
>> reference is within a not-completed sumti.
>
>I would have said in that case {ri} is still {la goran}, since that
>is the last complete sumti. I do agree that you can't get to {le tavla}
>with ra, because it is not complete.
>
>How about in {le nu tavla la goran ri}? Again the {le nu..} is not complete,
>so {ri} can't be {la goran}? I think this rule is too complicated, why not
>let it be just the last complete one?

I'll let Cowan rule on this.  It has been discussed previously, I am sure,
and I will agree with whatever was said before.  I could accept your
understanding if it is consistent with history.

lojbab