Re: lo terspu be la Nik. .e la Xorxes .e la Goran

[Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>]

And:
> > > [What is "iseju"?]
> > Sentence logical connector. It says that the second sentence
> > is true whether or not the first one is. (seju is the reverse of ju.)
> > Something like "in any case".
>
> I don't know how you could work that out from the cmavo list.

Probably seju should be listed, like janai, jonai, etc. already are.

> I hadn't realized moi wasn't an ordinal roi!

Well, it isn't. That's why we need {re'u}.

> > Also, {se ja te temci} is probably not what you meant. {seja} means the
> > same as {ja}, because it is a symmetric connector.
>
> Would "seljavtertemci" make a difference? How does one conjoin members
> of SE (surely something one might often wish to do)?

Whyever would one wish to do that? You can always say {se temci ja te temci},
but I don't really see a need for a more compact form. The lujvo is probably
understandable too.


> XU do doi Nik. penmi le selnei gihe pendo vau be mi beho pohu lehi kosta
> gehu ku la melbi borno tcadu ckule bantadni stura?

la melbi borno ????

co'o mi'e xorxes
(to noi ciska to'o la pitsi burgo toi)