[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
- Subject: Re: Some thoughts on Lojban gadri
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 01:29:47 -0500
- Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
LL>What remains doubtful in my mind is the extent to which component
LL>properties can be attributed to various portions of the mass which are not
LL>grouped componentwise. On a straightforward reading, the number of legs
LL>that "pisu'o loi ractu" has can be anything from zero to 4 * N, where there
LL>are N rabbits in the universe, since "loi" is -specific and simply asserts
LL>that
LL>>some< portion of the rabbity-blob has a given number of legs. Maybe
LL>there is really no property inheritance from parts to wholes at all, and
LL>--More--
LL>the belief that there was came from the insufficiently appreciated
LL>non-specificness of "loi".
I think property inheritance works the otther way - from whole to part - in
masses. The smallest possible component of loi djacu is that which
exhibits all relevant properties of water. The question of relevance is
of course context dependent - the smallest component of loi du be mi that can hold a pencil is a finger. The smallest that can talk is my respiratory system
etc. In context, either of these can represent Mr. Me. For arbitrary
instances of Mr. Rabbit, I would normally presume that such smallest components
have 4 legs and 2 ears, unless Mr. Rabbit is in my stew %^).
LL>But if so, then the quantifier "piro" proposed by Jorge for "lei" won't
LL>work in the way we expect. "lei re prenu", viz. "la alis. joi la djordj."
LL>has four legs, and the notion that if Alice is small and George is big,
LL>then the mass is both small and big, breaks down. Alice-joi-George would
LL>have to be compared to other masses-of-two-persons, not to individual
LL>properties of individual persons.
I thought I was the one that proposed this - a long time ago. The archetype
of lei is the two men carrying a log (together) across the field, in which
case you WANT the default quantifier to be the entire mass rather than a
portion. On the other hand, I gues the "Relevant portion for context" could
suffice here too - the smallest relevant portion just happens to be "all".
But this seems to be stretching things. I have no problem with "lei re remna"
having 4 legs as a default for most remna pairs that I know.
lojbab