[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Missing from ref grammar
I haven't been able to find a thorough discussion anywhere in the reference
grammar about poi, noi, and ke'a. The difference between poi and noi is
used as an analogy to something else (pe and ne? I don't remember now) so
they do get mentioned, but never explicitly introduced, despite the claim
that they are "described in more detail elsewhere".
I know there are papers yet to be written, so if this is already scheduled
for coverage in one of them, then never mind.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Bogart
cbogart@quetzal.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~