[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: le le la jbotur. ckafyzda ku jbofitpla
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
- Subject: RE: le le la jbotur. ckafyzda ku jbofitpla
- From: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122
- Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
> Oh, now I see. Hmmmm. Maybe some UIs could do the trick. Maybe
> {fidakaunaizo'o no'uzo'onai}? Not that much better, and I'm misusing
> {kau}. Wasn't it originally proposed as a cmavo for "known!"? What should
> be used for that meaning now?
>
> ~mark
I can't quite make up my mind whether the new {bi'u} ("new",
"not-yet-mentioned") and {bi'unai} ("old", "previously-mentioned")
can serve for "unknown" and "known".
Iain.