[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: proposals regarding abstractors
- To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
- Subject: RE: proposals regarding abstractors
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 10:44:15 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <9208171140.AA05981@getafix.oasis.icl.co.uk>; from "oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122" at Aug 17, 92 12:40 pm
la .i,n cusku di'e
> BUT
>
> The latest gismu list says that the x2 of {cusku} is
> "du'u/text/lu'e concept", i.e. {le du'u broda} is a text.
> All the other words with a {du'u} place don't have such
> alternatives, but appear to make more sense with a "concept"
> rather than a "text".
Delete "du'u" from the x2 of "cusku"; it was obviously inserted in error.
When it was written, the uses of "sedu'u" were not understood.
Otherwise, I believe everything you say is correct.
--
John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.