[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
'Essential' - reply to jimc
- To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>, Ken Taylor <taylor@gca.com>
- Subject: 'Essential' - reply to jimc
- From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!91909372>
- Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!91909372>
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
I don't tink there is such a thing as an essential place - or if there
is, it only makes sense in a very narrow interpretation (cf 'Core
Grammatical Relations' as in Relational Grammar). As you say lojbab
argues, the places are a matter of negotiation between speakers. You can
argue 'it would be more (often) useful to have this positional argument
than that one', but I don't believe that a simple binary
'essential/non-essential' is the slightest bit useful.
Kolen Fain
c.j.fine@bradford.ac.uk