[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elision, or: Nick rides again in jbonai
- To: lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com
- Subject: Re: Elision, or: Nick rides again in jbonai
- From: "Arthur W. Protin Jr." (GC-ACCURATE) <cbmvax!uunet!PICA.ARMY.MIL!protin>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 91 15:40:36 EDT
- Cc: Guy Steele <gls@think.com>
Folks,
When Guy Steele said
^ The elidable terminators make the language unambiguous, but may often be
^ ^^ ????????
^Did you mean "ambiguous"?
I could not believe he could be so dense. I am very thankful that he took
the time to clarify what he was saying,
The terminators in question, namely those that happen to be
elidable (that's a useful way for me to identify them to you),
are required in the language to avoid ambiguity, though in
practice they may be omitted in many places.
================
MORE IMPORTANTLY
================
He is also very correct in saying that the grammar is incomplete
because it lacks a codification of the rules for eliding terminators.
I doubt that many of will use the formal grammar to learn the
language but most of us that do use the grammar to analyse the language
will profit from a more complete grammar regardless of the number of
additional rules needed to make the grammar more complete.
So thank you Guy Steele,
and
thank you all,
Art Protin
Arthur Protin <protin@pica.army.mil>
These are my personal views and do not reflect those of my boss
or this installation.